VeChain partners with 2 local tech companies

On Friday, VeChain announced their partnership with two technology service providers in China. Unfortunately, the news was only announced in Chinese, and sent the internet scurrying for their translation apps. 

Shanghai Houlianhui Information Technology is working on a digital certification service that can be used by government agencies, schools, as well as many other professional industries like finance and law. 

Zhongshang Beidou is a Beijing-based supply chain management company that provides a number of services, including blockchain-as-a-service. They partnered with VeChain to provide a food traceability program, similar to the Bright Code announcement by DNV GL.

Both of these companies are relatively new, having been established in 2015. Neither announcement will set the world on fire, but they show a consistent trend that I’ve been discussing for awhile now. VeChain continues to fragment, providing the core technology for existing service companies to build upon. The benefits of this strategy are: 

  • Enterprises bring unique experience for specialized situations
  • Enterprises have access to existing client bases with established trust and reputation
  • Enterprises are more likely to promote their own solutions to clients
  • Clients, especially in China, are more likely to use a solution built by a recognized and trusted partner
  • Business Development is separate from the VeChain digital currency, providing legal compliance
  • VeChain doesn’t need to hire as many in-house developers
  • VeChain’s development team can focus on developing core features rather than third-party dApps

The personal experience and established client bases companies like this bring to VeChain forms a valuable launchpad towards becoming a globally-recognized enterprise blockchain. Two weeks ago we saw similar integration with BIOS Middle East (Dubai), who are also creating their own BaaS solution for their customers. As this trend continues, VeChain on-chain transactions will continue to increase as third-party web-based service providers expand the functionality of the blockchain.

Buy VET at OceanEx
Buy VET at OceanEx

Latest Posts

Company behind the “China rankings” is not China’s Center for Information

For months, many people have been baffled by a ranked list of cryptocurrencies, with clickbait titles insinuating that the country is endorsing EOS as the top blockchain.

These titles make for great blog posts and tweets, but leave many people scratching their heads.

Why is a country with an active ban on ICOs and cryptocurrency exchanges endorsing one of the biggest ICO-funded coins in the industry?

The answer is pretty simple: It’s not. The ministry that oversees the Internet and other technologies is MIIT, or the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (中华人民共和国工业和信息化部). The people behind the list are SaiDiWang, or CCIDNet, which while technically is an affiliate of MIIT, are overseeing the rankings as a private project.

Contacting CCIDNET

I contacted CCIDNet over the phone, and while they were very polite and knowledgeable, admitted to doing the project on their own as part of their internet consulting services. The title of their rankings translates roughly as “SaiDi Global Blockchain Technology Rankings” and includes an explanation that they are published by a SaiDi Blockchain Agency in Qingdao, China. I suspect that most of the confusion comes from overzealous non-Chinese speakers who are unable to distinguish between a third-party consultancy and an official government ministry.

I then asked why large marketcap projects like TRX and VeChain were unlisted, to which they replied that TRX would be ranked starting in January, and that VeChain had opted out of the rankings.

To me, this was a red flag. Why would a third-party ranking system seek permission of open-source projects before listing them? The speaker on the phone implied that VeChain was unconfident about where they would end up on the list, and didn’t want to hurt their brand image by a low score. While I may be biased, I do think that VeChain would score fairly high based on tech, applicability, and creativity, leaving this excuse as an implausible one.

Which leaves us with the possibility that VeChain felt the rankings were a waste of time, flawed, or refused to offer payment in exchange for a listing.

Appearing on Social Media

Searching around social media landed a few more bits of information.

The top two posts on a search titled “Does anyone understand SaiDi Consulting?” were basically people complaining about everything from the company having a “low” skill-level to annoying management. The conclusion seemed to be that working there would be useful for someone seeking to switch their household registration “hukou” (read more about that here) but provided few other professional benefits.

Conclusion

SaiDi Consulting makes these rankings as a service for their customers, but doesn’t pretend the rankings are endorsed by a government ministry. That three of Dan Larimer’s projects (EOS, Bitshares, Steemit) are in the top-ten should be enough evidence that the rankings are heavily biased. Since SaiDi Consulting reaches out to blockchains before including them on the list, I would be highly suspicious of soliciting bribes. SaiDi Consulting is free to make rankings as a service for their customers, but it is no more credible than if I made one myself.

Author’s Note: This is not meant to be financial advice. For more of my analysis on China’s blockchain regulation, click here.

Follow me on Twitter

Buy VET at OceanEx
Buy VET at OceanEx

Latest Posts

Hubble’s Law and the Expanding Vechain Universe

Hubble’s Law helps people understand that most objects in space are moving away from us, and that their distance from us is proportionate to the speed in which they are moving. This involves the concept that all things originated from a single point, and have been expanding out and away from each other at a somewhat constant speed ever since. For Vechain, this singular point may be hard to pin down, but for the purposes of what we are discussing, let’s go back to September 6th, 2016, when BitSE (Vechain’s previous parent company) announced their partnership with Kuehne & Nagel. This set things in motion, and one of the world’s first supply chain-based blockchain-as-a-service (BaaS) companies was thrust into the limelight.

From there, things soon began to evolve. Fashion designers Babyghost were added to the mix, and Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences began toying with the idea of using IoT devices and the blockchain to regulate soil and climate conditions around crops. For a long time, CEO Sunny Lu and his team were able to keep everything under the Vechain umbrella, and eager investors salivated over every rumor and press release that detailed just how far this universe could expand. Rumor after rumor formed in this linear fashion, and the price continued to surge. This culminated with the rebranding event on February 26th, 2018, where Vechain went on to announce further partnerships including VeResearch, dApps, ICO’s, and a Carbon Bank initiative with DNV GL.

For many, this was too good to be true. How could one company plan to do so much? As the bear market began to take its grip, people’s doubts became fears, and as summer rolled around, manifested into a -90% price nightmare. Many wrote off Vechain as a scam, a hustle, created in China to extract money from gullible westerners. Many thought back to February 26th, with the gaudy ornamental hammer that CEO Sunny Lu, DNV GL’s Luca Crisciotti, and PwC China’s Elton Huang had slammed on the podium, and wondered how they could have been duped by such an obvious scam.

But this wasn’t a scam, as nearly 10 months on, we’ve seen steady progress with flurries of new developments mixed in. That hammer in Singapore was the point where things split. The singularity, where Vechain’s ecosystem began to aggressively move apart.

And now, with 2018 coming to a close, we struggle to grasp the total scope of the ecosystem. DNV GL has grasped the food safety initiative by the horns with their Bright Code platform, created in conjunction with the second-largest food manufacturer in China, Bright Foods. Secondly, the Carbon Bank initiative has joined forces with the world’s largest electric car producer, BYD, and one of China’s largest state-owned insurance providers, PICC. Tsinghua University, Michigan State, and Oxford University continue the research initiatives set out by Vechain. A handful of ICO’s cover everything from protecting animal rights (Cecil Alliance), gaming (Plair), casino gaming and betting on sports (Decent.Bet), as well as token management (Safe Haven). Newly launched exchange OceanEx creates a platform where digital assets can be exchanged. Shanghai Gas and ENN holdings are creating a liquid natural gas solution to manage the production and storage of LNG products. The recent announcement of Swell has created a project dedicated to verifying the authenticity of shoes and fashion products. Aqua and Taotaoke are busy creating solutions for protecting and monetizing digital media. With each of these individual projects having a high chance of succeeding, the Vechain universe is well and truly split.

Fragmentation as a Business Model

When I first began explaining Vechain to friends, I mistakenly told them that in a few years we’d be using Vechain chips to verify a number of products we use in our daily lives. This appeared to be the plan, and something Vechain’s various Proof-of-concepts demonstrated was possible. Bottled wine, tea, beanies, and shoes all showcased this potential. But it leaves Vechain with a difficult task in a highly-competitive blockchain space: running around trying to convince other industries to adopt and continue using the Vechain’s technology.

Instead, we’ve seen the fragmentation resulting from Vechain encouraging industry leaders to develop their own solutions on Vechain’s core blockchain technology. By developing their own apps and solutions, industries maintain control over their users, data, and branding. To think that we’d be browsing a grocery store and see people pulling out smartphones to scan a bottle of milk with their Vechain apps was silly. What’s far more likely is that business will embed the decentralized blockchain into their own apps, and customers will unwittingly be accessing the Vechain blockchain through each product they verify.

Why is this strategy far more beneficial?

  • Industries will have specialized solutions, with specialized branding that appeal to their customers and needs.
  • Enterprises will be able retain control of their customer relationship management (CRM) and information systems.
  • Fragmentation will result in resources being utilized more efficiently and cost-effectively.
  • More effective than a one-blockchain-fits-all approach, that would alienate certain user groups and industries.

Many long-term investors of Vechain will be looking at some of the recent developments and be wondering how exactly we got to where we are today. But the fact is simple, specialized use-cases need specialized solutions, especially when professional industries are involved. In my opinion, if Vechain truly succeeds, it will do so as a backbone of BaaS solutions, much like Oracle or Cisco power many of our business solutions without the general public ever realizing it. Memories of the hammer may fade away, and exist as an inside joke among early investors.

But like Hubble’s Law states, the further apart something appears, the faster the velocity with which it has been traveling.

As Vechain’s universe continues to spread apart, these projects created along the way add incredible value to the platform. Bright Foods can connect to Chinese consumers in ways Vechain never could. PICC can connect with more account holders, BYD can connect with more drivers, Shanghai Gas can connect with more refineries, all without Vechain breaking a sweat. The open nature of these platforms will require digital data management solutions that will be the core of Vechain’s services, and create a multitude of opportunities for third parties to participate and extract value. The amount of data that the hundreds of millions of customers that PwC, DNG GL, BYD, Shanghai Gas, Bright Foods, and PICC will bring to this blockchain should be staggering, and enough to placate even the most-anxious of investors.

Most importantly, this should alleviate a consistent fear critics have of the two-token system: Does a company need to hold the token to use the platform? The short answer is no, but with the sheer volume of data, VTHO consumption will surely reach a point where it exceeds daily production, and began rising in value. While it’s highly unlikely that happens anytime in the next few weeks or even months, I believe token price appreciation should increase based upon:

  • Massive exposure from industries and enterprises indirectly promoting their own projects.
  • Third party dApps seeking to take advantage of a high volume data marketplace.
  • Acceptance and positive regulation by the governments who see value in sustainable projects set forth by DNV GL.
  • Companies seeking the convenience of producing their own VTHO versus buying on the market.

I attempted to make this map to visualize where it all ends up. I gave up, after I realized the links were too far apart, and spreading further with each passing day. Whatever the result is, it’s almost impossible to identify the limits of what Blockchain technology might be. Many companies are flirting with the known boundaries, but for me Vechain crashes through, bringing potential solutions that not only generate value but also increase safety and sustainability on a global spectrum. For me, I’ve stopped questioning whether or not Vechain can leave an impact on China and the global marketplace. It won’t be Vechain alone. It will be hundreds of companies, individuals, and government leaders who do all the heavy lifting. Vechain just needs to make it all link together.

Buy VET at OceanEx
Buy VET at OceanEx

Latest Posts

Cryptocurrency solutions so easy you can send some to Grandma for Christmas!

One of my favorite third-party developers is Arkane Network. Why? Because they understand that one of the key things holding back mainstream adoption is convenience and a lack of tech skills by most of the population. Earlier wallets were always a nightmare, with mnemonic seeds (I still don’t think I can pronounce that right) and keystore files. There was always that pressure that I was going to mess up the process somehow and end up losing all my money. That was before 2018 rolled around, and I lost it anyways, mind you.

But now, Arkane Network is creating a set of tools that makes it easy for everyone. The results are fantastic, you can sign up for a cryptocurrency wallet using only Facebook, Google, or a private email address. You secure the wallet with a 4–6 digit pin number. It looks and feels like a user interface we are all familiar with, long before cryptographic hash functions and SHA-256 started making things complicated. Right now, it works with Ethereum and Vechain, but is promising even more options in the future.

User-Friendly login screen featuring Google & Facebook login options

This week, Arkane Network really raised the bar by implementing a new feature that treats email addresses as cryptocurrency addresses. Using my Gmail address to log in, I can now send VET to anyone I want, as long as I know their email address. That means no more scanning QR codes and trying to type 42-character crypto addresses. I just type their email address into the transaction address form, and submit send.


I tried it, sending 1 VET to my alternate email address, that I had never used for anything regarding digital currencies in the past. After less than 2 minutes, I received this notification in my email inbox:

Having never used this email, it was all-to-easy to sign up and collect

After clicking the link, I was instructed to register with my email address, in a very easy and non-cryptographic fashion. And sure enough, upon confirming my email, I was presented with my new account, including the new funds I had just sent myself.

Instead of filling in a blockchain address in the “to” field, just enter an email address to transfer crypto to friends. This feature allows people to work with blockchain technology without realizing they are using it, quite literally, it is as easy as sending an email.

For more on how this works, click here.

The beauty of a tool like Arkane is it doesn’t just make it easier for less tech-savvy users to get a wallet, it also makes it easier for developers to include Ethereum and Vechain blockchain capabilities into their own apps using Arkane Network’s developer friendly API. The work Arkane Network is doing is a crucial step in making digital currencies accessible for anyone, including your grandparents.


I encourage everyone to spend a few minutes reading about the Arkane Network project and sign up here!

Buy VET at OceanEx
Buy VET at OceanEx

Latest Posts

Hema Xiansheng Label-Gate, and how it affects the fresh food industry (translated from Bright Code)

This is an article written by Bright Code and published in Chinese here. I have translated it with permission, and made minor adjustments to give readers a more clear insight into the world that Chinese consumers face. Bright Code has already begun the process of implementing their solutions, and the first products are expected to be available for purchase in Q1 of next year.


China is no stranger to food safety scandals, and a recent event involving “Hema Xiansheng” (an Alibaba eCommerce app, retailer, and distributor that sells and delivers fresh groceries to customers) will undoubtedly destroy a lot of trust that the platform and industry has built up.

Secure data security and truth
“Food traceability” must rely on blockchain technology

This “Hema Xiansheng Label-gate” involves customers witnessing the employee switching updated labels on expired products to be sold as fresh. Data can be arbitrarily falsified, creating a major loophole in the supply chain. It is impossible to ensure the trustworthiness of the data based on the “QR code” linked to private company databases.

According to a study, the company behind the app and retail center directly picks up bulk vegetables from Chongming and other cities in China, and then makes independent smaller deliveries to the regional warehouses or processing centers. They marks the time of listing, date of manufacture and address on the sales label of its vegetable products, before sending it to stores for sale. Without any third party overseeing this supply chain, data can easily be falsified or tampered with.

The most significant technical advantages of the blockchain are to reduce human intervention and creating data that can’t be falsified, which can establish an open, transparent and trustworthy method in all aspects of the food industry.

For external sources on the Label-Gate incident, click here.

Take the fresh milk brand Nongchang Lianren (Cupid’s Farm) on the Bright Code platform as an example. It relies on Bright Code’s intelligent algorithms and big data to mark the production process and time on each bottle of milk. If a consumer buys a bottle of Nongchang Lianren, they can clearly view and track the full life-cycle of the product including data on:

Which farm did the dairy product comes from? Which batch of milk? Is the dairy product quarantined? Is it bottled under suitable temperature and conditions?

All data is uploaded to the blockchain and is labeled with a non-tamperable stamp. Data will also be updated and maintained by different parties along the supply chain including the ranch, factory, warehouse, and other logistical parties to ensure that data is supported on the timeline, proving the truth and security of the data.

Bright Code’s consumer confidence platform data comes directly from the source of the goods, including production information, logistics information, and consumer information feedback. It also has a world-class third-party advisory in DNV GL to oversee and supervise the process.

With consumer confidence as a new retail model,
Bright Code continues to empower the industry

The process of initiating an entire new retail model will require immense cooperation from members spanning multiple industries and within the community. However, no matter how innovative the current business model is, consumers are most concerned about the quality of the product and the experience of the service. Once consumers lose confidence in the current business model, they will question the entire industry, triggering mass changes.

Therefore, confidence is a prerequisite for realizing the next phase in business value, and this is the mission of Bright Code.

Bright Code practices the core concepts of security, trust, and openness. They use this to attract companies to join the Bright Code ecosystem. Bright Code will continue to use technology to empower various industries, and continue to build a bridge of trust between businesses and consumers.

Buy VET at OceanEx
Buy VET at OceanEx

Latest Posts